Twenty tests on pure noise find something 64.7% of the time
At least one of 20 -tests is significant in 64.7% of 10,000 studies, as predicts; Bonferroni brings it to 5%.
1 - 0.95^msimulated, 5% levelsimulated, Bonferroni
| Quantity | Viv | Checked by |
|---|---|---|
rate | 0.6467 | at least one of 20 is significant in 62.7% to 65.7% of the studies |
rate bonferroni | 0.0501 | with Bonferroni's 0.05 / 20 the rate is between 4% and 6% |
expected | 0.641514 | at least one of 20 is significant in 62.7% to 65.7% of the studies |
multiple_testing.viv
Output · native build · Oct 14, 2026 · 0.67 s
rate: 0.6467 rate_bonferroni: 0.0501 expected: 0.641514
- ✓ at least one of 20 is significant in 62.7% to 65.7% of the studies
- ✓ with Bonferroni's 0.05 / 20 the rate is between 4% and 6%
Open in the workbenchAtlasMore statistics claims
- Full statement
- Running 20 independent -tests at the 5% level on pure noise (each on 10 standard normal draws), at least one comes out significant in 64.7% of 10,000 simulated studies (between 62.7% and 65.7%), as predicts, while the Bonferroni level brings the rate down to between 4% and 6%.
- Scope
- Fixed seed; the band is the expected rate plus or minus 3 binomial standard deviations (0.0048 at 10,000 studies). Independent tests only: correlated tests inflate the rate less.
- Reference
- for independent tests at level ; the Bonferroni bound for the family-wise error (Dunn, "Multiple comparisons among means", JASA 56 (1961) 52-64). The p-values use the normal tail of lib/stats/special.
claims/stats/multiple_testing.viv#61cd18ce52